July 1, 2022
  • July 1, 2022
  • Home
  • Expenses
  • Tax Court in Brief | Rau v. Comm’r | Deductions for Business Expenses and Non-cash Charitable Contributions – Taxation

Tax Court in Brief | Rau v. Comm’r | Deductions for Business Expenses and Non-cash Charitable Contributions – Taxation

By on March 23, 2022 0


United States: Tax Court in Brief | Rau v. Comm’r | Deductions for business expenses and non-monetary charitable contributions

To print this article, all you need to do is be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.

The Tax Court in Brief – March 7 – March 11, 2022

Freeman Law’s “Tax Court Brief” covers all of the Tax Court’s substantive opinions, providing a weekly summary of its decisions in clear, concise prose.

For a link to our podcast on the Tax Court in a nutshell, download here or watch other episodes of The Freeman Bill.

Tax litigation: the week of March 7, 2022 to March 11, 2022


  • Hacker c. Comm’r, memo from TC. 2022-16 | March 8, 2022 | Paris, J | Dekt. No. 3870-12


  • Cosio c. Comm’r, TC Memo. 2022-18 | March 9, 2022 | Weiler, J. | Dekt. No. 23623-17L


  • Sherwin Community Painters Inc. v. Comm’r, memo from TC. 2022-19 | March 9, 2022 | Goeke, J. | Dekt. Nos. 4113-19, 4647-19 (consolidated with
    Ward vs. Comm’r)

Rau v. Comm’r, TC Opin. 2022-4 | March 7, 2022 | Guy, J | Dekt. No. 23074-19S

Opinion

Short summary: Rau, a mortgage broker, worked as an independent realtor and was employed by Westmore Group, LLC (LLC). Rau managed three residential rental properties. The LLC did not have an employee business expense reimbursement policy. The issues are whether Rau was entitled to various deductions claimed on his Form 1040 for the tax year at issue, including non-monetary charitable contributions, unreimbursed employee business expenses, and other business expenses.

Main holdings:

  • Rau’s mileage logs were insufficient to justify deducting mileage expenses because they lacked necessary information such as where a trip originated, its precise destination, and business purpose. Rau also provided insufficient information on meal expenses as the records were not prepared at the same time and did not identify a business purpose. And, for her non-monetary charitable contribution, Rau failed to present objective and credible evidence that the non-monetary household items she donated were “in good, used condition or better,” as required to qualify. a deduction for charitable contribution.

Main points of law:

  • Section 162(a) allows the deduction of “all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the year of taxation in the exercise of a trade or business”. The term “trade or business” includes the provision of services as an employee.

  • Typically, a cash basis taxpayer deducts expenses for the year from the payment. To deduct an employee’s business expenses, a taxpayer must prove that he did not receive and was not entitled to receive reimbursement from his employer.

  • The taxpayer is responsible for establishing his right to authorized deductions and justifying the amounts claimed. To see 26 USC § 6001; Treasures. Reg. § 1.6001-1(a).

  • For travel expenses (including meals and accommodation away from home), no deduction is allowed unless the taxpayer justifies by adequate records or by sufficient and credible evidence corroborating his own declaration the amount, the time, place and business purpose of each expense. See id. at § 274(d); Treasures. Reg. § 1.274-5T(b)(2)(ii)-(iii).

  • Expenses for incidental repairs to an investment property may be deducted under section 162 by a taxpayer on a cash basis when paid, while capital improvements are added to the basis of the investment property and recovered on the sale of the property under section 263.
  • Charitable donations are deductible only if verified in accordance with regulations. No deduction is allowed for any contribution of clothing or household items – such as furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances, linens and other similar items – unless such items are “in good used condition or better”. § 170(f)(16)(A), (D)(i).

Knowledge: This case illustrates the ever-increasing requirement to document what might be ordinary and necessary deductible expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business. To deduct an employee’s business expenses, a taxpayer must prove that he has not received or is not entitled to receive reimbursement from his employer. The taxpayer must have and maintain adequate records, made at the time of the expense, to substantiate the available deduction. Travel logs, odometer readings and other contemporaneous documentation showing the time, place and business purpose of an expense are essential to properly substantiate entitlement to a deduction for an expense incurred in the carrying on a trade or business, including services as an employee. For non-monetary charitable contributions in the form of clothing or household goods, the taxpayer must be prepared to show that the property was donated “in good used condition or better”.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: United States Tax

Prepare for IRS Plans to Increase Tax Audits

ORBA

In recent years, the IRS has only audited about 0.5% of individual tax returns. Their audit choices were more high net returns and larger companies with more tax issues.

U.S. Tax Laws: A 2021 Review and a 2022 Snapshot

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg

Last year, we predicted that the biggest US tax news in 2021 would be revenue-generating legislation Democrats would introduce after Joe Biden was elected as the 46th President of the United States.

Court rules Washington’s capital gains tax unconstitutional

Lane Powell

On March 1, 2022, the Douglas County Superior Court ruled that Washington’s new capital gains tax was unconstitutional. The tax, enacted in 2021, would have imposed a 7% tax on long-term capital gains over $250,000…

Tax Meets ESG: Preparing for Bad Press

Mayer Brown

In a recent legal update[1]we discussed the intersection between tax and ESG and the challenges companies will face in response to external pressures for greater transparency of a company’s overall tax position.