November 4, 2021
  • November 4, 2021
  • Home
  • Expenses
  • UN Special Rapporteur on Health supports abortion at the expense of women’s health

UN Special Rapporteur on Health supports abortion at the expense of women’s health

By on October 21, 2021 0

The United Nations’ greatest health czar presented his debut report at the international assembly on October 20. COVID-19[female[feminine pandemic provides a starting point for the presentation, the real focus of the report was abortion.

Dr Tlaleng Mofokeng is the new United Nations special rapporteur on the right to physical and mental health. Her report focuses on the theme of women’s “sexual and reproductive health rights”.

Such reports from international officials may seem irrelevant to pro-life Americans, but in reality, they reinforce a self-referential body of soft law seeking to advance abortion – even when such activism comes to the fore. costs health and life of women.

Mofokeng’s report makes controversial claims. First, it is said that “sexual and reproductive health encompasses… safe abortion care”.

>>> The American promotion of abortion abroad is a matter of ideological colonialism, not gender equality

Second, it asserts that “States have clear legal obligations under current human rights standards to ensure the respect, protection and fulfillment of sexual and reproductive health rights”.

Third, he declares that “safe and legal abortion is a necessary component of comprehensive health services”.

But to insist that UN member states have a legal obligation to respect their citizens’ alleged right to safe abortions flies in the face of common sense and international law.

The right to life is enshrined in international human rights law. It is also protected in the constitutions or national laws of many countries around the world.

In addition, there is no “right to abortion” in international law, as a significant number of UN member states have reaffirmed in the Geneva Consensus Statement Last year.

Just this month Guatemala became the latest country to adhere to the Geneva Consensus Declaration, courageously helping build a coalition of countries that stand up to pro-abortion activists at the UN and work together to promote women’s health, lives and families.

Institutionally, the United Nations Charter demands that the UN respect the sovereign right of nations to make their own laws regarding abortion. Most of the 193 UN member states strongly restrict abortion or ban it entirely. The United States is an exception. With just six other countries, including China and North Korea, the United States allows elective abortion beyond 20 weeks.

These facts do not prevent Mofokeng, who describes himself as “an activist at heart” for abortion. This is exactly what it does in its report, which complemented the governments of Brazil, Ireland and the UK in introducing telemedicine for abortion, as well as Argentina for its recent legalization of abortion. abortion.

But if Mofokeng were a true champion for women’s health, she would raise serious concerns about the practice. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant promotion chemical or “medical” abortion, dramatically threatening women’s health.

As my colleague Melanie Israel describes, chemical abortion “takes a lot longer, involves a lot more bleeding and pain, and complications occur four times more frequently… compared to surgical abortions”.

Pro-abortion actors in the United States and abroad have worked to weaken existing restrictions on chemical abortion pills and promote telemedicine and mail-order pills under the guise of pandemic concerns.

This leads to more women going through this dangerous process at home, far from medical supervision and support.

The consequences for women of self-administration mifepristone and misoprostol can be devastating, especially in the developing world.

Mofokeng’s report, concerning for its shameless promotion of abortion, is even more dangerous by further perpetuating the lie that abortion is a human right.

UN human rights mechanisms regularly promote their own recommendations and cite each other’s opinions as authoritative, thus creating a body of soft law that contradicts the text of the treaty that member states have negotiated. and adopted.

>>> Chemical abortion: a review

It’s just about repeating something enough times to make people believe it’s true. Too often it works.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights boldly declared: “Human rights organizations have provided clear guidance on the need to decriminalize abortion.

In fact, the UN human rights apparatus has found or created a right to abortion among the rights to health, privacy and even the right not to be subjected to cruel treatment. , inhuman and degrading. This is a far cry from respecting state sovereignty in regulating abortion.

Faced with such aggressive and ultra vires action by the UN to promote abortion at all costs, representatives of more member states must raise their voices in defense of women’s health and the rights of unborn children.

This piece originally appeared in The daily signal

Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *